Import of MSDTC transaction failed

Error: 8509, State: 1, Message: Import of MSDTC transaction failed: Result
Code = 0x8004d00e
I can not find any help on many websites.
How to do it?
The error message says that SQL Server can not enlist in the transaction
that is provide because the transaction is already implicitly or explicitly
committed or aborted.
Which OS are you on? If you are using Windows XP or Windows Server 2003 you
can use DTC trace to find out why the transaction import failed. If you do
not have this OS, you could use AppMetrics from ExtermeSoft see
http://www.xtremesoft.com
GertD@.SQLDev.Net
Please reply only to the newsgroups.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
You assume all risk for your use.
Copyright SQLDev.Net 1991-2004 All rights reserved.
"lv mingtong" <lmt@.taeco.com.discuss> wrote in message
news:eUww2DIlEHA.1644@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Error: 8509, State: 1, Message: Import of MSDTC transaction failed: Result
> Code = 0x8004d00e
> I can not find any help on many websites.
> How to do it?
>
|||I too am having this issue. The db is running on Win XP Professional,
SQL Server 2K + ASP.NET app. It is an intermittent issue and occurs
every 4th hit to any page. I am using
System.EnterpriseServices.AutoCompleteAttribute(Tr ue) to auto commit
the transaction. The strange thing is that if I hit the maching
remotely it is fine...If I do it locally the error will appear.
Eg.
Scenario #1: Works and is fine:
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc
Machine B = DB server
Scenario #2: Generates the error "Import of MSDTC transaction failed:
Result Code = 0x8004d00e."
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc + DB server
It is a strange issue that is not constant.
Any suggestions will be attempted...no matter how bizzare
Thanks
|||I too am having this issue. The db is running on Win XP Professional,
SQL Server 2K + ASP.NET app. It is an intermittent issue and occurs
every 4th hit to any page. I am using
System.EnterpriseServices.AutoCompleteAttribute(Tr ue) to auto commit
the transaction. The strange thing is that if I hit the maching
remotely it is fine...If I do it locally the error will appear.
Eg.
Scenario #1: Works and is fine:
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc
Machine B = DB server
Scenario #2: Generates the error "Import of MSDTC transaction failed:
Result Code = 0x8004d00e."
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc + DB server
It is a strange issue that is not constant.
Any suggestions will be attempted...no matter how bizzare
Thanks
sql

Import of MSDTC transaction failed

Error: 8509, State: 1, Message: Import of MSDTC transaction failed: Result
Code = 0x8004d00e
I can not find any help on many websites.
How to do it?The error message says that SQL Server can not enlist in the transaction
that is provide because the transaction is already implicitly or explicitly
committed or aborted.
Which OS are you on? If you are using Windows XP or Windows Server 2003 you
can use DTC trace to find out why the transaction import failed. If you do
not have this OS, you could use AppMetrics from ExtermeSoft see
http://www.xtremesoft.com
GertD@.SQLDev.Net
Please reply only to the newsgroups.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
You assume all risk for your use.
Copyright © SQLDev.Net 1991-2004 All rights reserved.
"lv mingtong" <lmt@.taeco.com.discuss> wrote in message
news:eUww2DIlEHA.1644@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Error: 8509, State: 1, Message: Import of MSDTC transaction failed: Result
> Code = 0x8004d00e
> I can not find any help on many websites.
> How to do it?
>|||I too am having this issue. The db is running on Win XP Professional,
SQL Server 2K + ASP.NET app. It is an intermittent issue and occurs
every 4th hit to any page. I am using
System.EnterpriseServices.AutoCompleteAttribute(True) to auto commit
the transaction. The strange thing is that if I hit the maching
remotely it is fine...If I do it locally the error will appear.
Eg.
Scenario #1: Works and is fine:
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc
Machine B = DB server
Scenario #2: Generates the error "Import of MSDTC transaction failed:
Result Code = 0x8004d00e."
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc + DB server
It is a strange issue that is not constant.
Any suggestions will be attempted...no matter how bizzare :)
Thanks|||I too am having this issue. The db is running on Win XP Professional,
SQL Server 2K + ASP.NET app. It is an intermittent issue and occurs
every 4th hit to any page. I am using
System.EnterpriseServices.AutoCompleteAttribute(True) to auto commit
the transaction. The strange thing is that if I hit the maching
remotely it is fine...If I do it locally the error will appear.
Eg.
Scenario #1: Works and is fine:
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc
Machine B = DB server
Scenario #2: Generates the error "Import of MSDTC transaction failed:
Result Code = 0x8004d00e."
Machine A = Web App, dll's etc + DB server
It is a strange issue that is not constant.
Any suggestions will be attempted...no matter how bizzare :)
Thanks

implicit txn

Hi ,
wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
db options ?
does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
changes to being written to the db ?
thks & rdgs
Hi,
In this mode you should either execute commit or rollback the transaction.
If you just disconnect all the transaction for that session
will be rolled back automatically.
This is actuall a session wide setting or server wide setting.
Session wide
SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS ON
Server wide
exec sp_configure N'user options', 2
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"maxzsim" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:cc2601c48a6a$1ce36e90$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
> db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
> changes to being written to the db ?
> thks & rdgs
|||Normally when you wish to have multiple statements grouped together in a
single transaction you must do a
Begin transaction... All work you do becomes part of the same group
transaction until you either commit or rollback the transaction.
Any statements (insert, update, delete) you make OUTSIDE of a begin tran,
commit pair are considered to be a transaction... Each statement is in it's
own transaction.
When you set implicit_transactions on, SQL Behaves differently.
Begin tran is no longer allowed, and almost EVERY statement you do
automatically begins a multi-statement transaction ( instead of each
statement being in it;s own tran.). Everything you do is aggregated into a
group transaction until you commit or rollback...
Most people do NOT use implicit_transactions.
BOL has more information ...
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"maxzsim" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:cc2601c48a6a$1ce36e90$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
> db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
> changes to being written to the db ?
> thks & rdgs

implicit txn

Hi ,
wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
db options ?
does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
changes to being written to the db ?
thks & rdgsHi,
In this mode you should either execute commit or rollback the transaction.
If you just disconnect all the transaction for that session
will be rolled back automatically.
This is actuall a session wide setting or server wide setting.
Session wide
SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS ON
Server wide
--
exec sp_configure N'user options', 2
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"maxzsim" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:cc2601c48a6a$1ce36e90$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
> db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
> changes to being written to the db ?
> thks & rdgs|||Normally when you wish to have multiple statements grouped together in a
single transaction you must do a
Begin transaction... All work you do becomes part of the same group
transaction until you either commit or rollback the transaction.
Any statements (insert, update, delete) you make OUTSIDE of a begin tran,
commit pair are considered to be a transaction... Each statement is in it's
own transaction.
When you set implicit_transactions on, SQL Behaves differently.
Begin tran is no longer allowed, and almost EVERY statement you do
automatically begins a multi-statement transaction ( instead of each
statement being in it;s own tran.). Everything you do is aggregated into a
group transaction until you commit or rollback...
Most people do NOT use implicit_transactions.
BOL has more information ...
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"maxzsim" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:cc2601c48a6a$1ce36e90$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
> db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
> changes to being written to the db ?
> thks & rdgs

implicit txn

Hi ,
wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
db options ?
does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
changes to being written to the db ?
thks & rdgsHi,
In this mode you should either execute commit or rollback the transaction.
If you just disconnect all the transaction for that session
will be rolled back automatically.
This is actuall a session wide setting or server wide setting.
Session wide
SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS ON
Server wide
--
exec sp_configure N'user options', 2
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"maxzsim" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:cc2601c48a6a$1ce36e90$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
> db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
> changes to being written to the db ?
> thks & rdgs|||>--Original Message--
>Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in
the
>db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
>changes to being written to the db ?
>thks & rdgs
>.
>|||Normally when you wish to have multiple statements grouped together in a
single transaction you must do a
Begin transaction... All work you do becomes part of the same group
transaction until you either commit or rollback the transaction.
Any statements (insert, update, delete) you make OUTSIDE of a begin tran,
commit pair are considered to be a transaction... Each statement is in it's
own transaction.
When you set implicit_transactions on, SQL Behaves differently.
Begin tran is no longer allowed, and almost EVERY statement you do
automatically begins a multi-statement transaction ( instead of each
statement being in it;s own tran.). Everything you do is aggregated into a
group transaction until you commit or rollback...
Most people do NOT use implicit_transactions.
BOL has more information ...
--
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"maxzsim" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:cc2601c48a6a$1ce36e90$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> wat's exactly implicit transaction being turned on in the
> db options ?
> does it mean i have to supply a commit txn for the
> changes to being written to the db ?
> thks & rdgs

Implicit Transaction mode in SQL Server 2000

Hi all:

I know i can use the sentence SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS ON in a Stored Procedure to force SQL Server to set the connection into implicit transaction mode.

Have i a sentence or configuration to force all SQL Server connections to implicit transaction mode?

Thanks in advance.

Nope, there is no way to change the default isolation level.

I have requested that this be added into the next release of SQL Server. Here is a link to the feature request https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=263746

|||Moving to appropriate forum from Documentation forum section.

Implicit transaction for a page request?

If I execute multiple SqlCommands in a single .aspx, using a single SqlConnection, are all the commands part of the same transaction?

That is, if I say:

cmd1.CommandText = "UPDATE foo SET myVal = myVal - 1"
cmd2.CommandText = "SELECT myVal FROM foo"
cmd1.Connection = myConn
cmd2.Connection = myConn
myConn.Open()
cmd1.ExecuteNonQuery() ' decrement myVal
intResult = CInt(cmd2.ExecuteScalar()) ' select value of myVal
myConn.Close()

Do the UPDATE and the SELECT happen in the same transaction, or is it possible that someone else would have changed the value of myVal between these two calls?Nope. Each statement has an implicit transaction but to put them both under a single transaction you have to use an explicit transaction.

So yes, data could have changed between the statements.

Don|||Thanks for the clarification. So if I understand you right, this:

cmd.CommandText = "UPDATE ... ; SELECT @.myResult = ... "
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()

would put them in the same transaction, which is what I want.|||Now I'm on shakier ground. I'm pretty sure that SQL Server still considers them to be separate statements, simply batched together. But not absolutely positive.

Any reason you don't want to just use an explicit transaction?

Don|||No -- I'd like to use an explicit transaction, but I'm not sure how. Can you give me an example of how to do it w/o moving the queries to a stored procedure?

Thanks!|||Well, you're opening yourself up to all kinds of security holes by using dynamic SQL like this. Stored procedures are much better way to go.

But you can either use transactions via dynamic SQL and batch statements, or using the SQLTransaction class in ADO.NET. The example in the .NET docs is pretty clear. For the latter, just new up a SQLTransaction object and use the connection object to begin the transaction. Then call either the Commit or Rollback methods of the transaction object.

But remember that your app won't be very secure unless you take all the steps to close the holes.

Don|||Thanks, Don. What kind of hacks am I risking? I'm using parameters to avoid sql-insertion attacks; are there other risks that come with using SqlCommands?|||Ah, you're using ADO.NET parameters? That wasn't clear from the snippets you've posted, although you had one @.Result showing. You're using parameters to provide the changeable values in the SQL, right?

If that's the case, you're probaly reasonably well protected from SQL injection, since ADO.NET passes the SQL and parameters separately to SQL Server, where they are inserted into the SQL.

Don

Implicit transaction count

Hello, everyone:
I need total transaction count. @.@.TRANCOUNT returens the number of explicit transaction. How about implicit transaction? Thanks a lot.
ZYTHmmm... ?
@.@.trancount (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tsqlref/ts_globals_8lx0.asp)
SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tsqlref/ts_set-set_7mur.asp)

Implicit transaction

Can Implicit Transactions be set for the Data Base and not for every query in
SQL Server? For a Data Base, how do we set that and how do we verify the
existing setting .
Ven
There is not databse option for this, but you do not have to set it for every
statement, you set it for the connection and it remains in effect until the
connection executes a SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS OFF statement.
AMB
"Ven" wrote:

> Can Implicit Transactions be set for the Data Base and not for every query in
> SQL Server? For a Data Base, how do we set that and how do we verify the
> existing setting .
> --
> Ven
|||Be wary of using this option, your program will remain in transaction state
almost all of the time..
Wayne Snyder MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
(Please respond only to the newsgroup.)
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ( PASS) and it's
community of SQL Professionals.
"Ven" <Ven@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B4AB9B4-8003-4122-AD69-0695985785A7@.microsoft.com...
> Can Implicit Transactions be set for the Data Base and not for every query
in
> SQL Server? For a Data Base, how do we set that and how do we verify the
> existing setting .
> --
> Ven

Implicit transaction

Can Implicit Transactions be set for the Data Base and not for every query i
n
SQL Server? For a Data Base, how do we set that and how do we verify the
existing setting .
--
VenThere is not databse option for this, but you do not have to set it for ever
y
statement, you set it for the connection and it remains in effect until the
connection executes a SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS OFF statement.
AMB
"Ven" wrote:

> Can Implicit Transactions be set for the Data Base and not for every query
in
> SQL Server? For a Data Base, how do we set that and how do we verify the
> existing setting .
> --
> Ven|||Be wary of using this option, your program will remain in transaction state
almost all of the time..
Wayne Snyder MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
(Please respond only to the newsgroup.)
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ( PASS) and it's
community of SQL Professionals.
"Ven" <Ven@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B4AB9B4-8003-4122-AD69-0695985785A7@.microsoft.com...
> Can Implicit Transactions be set for the Data Base and not for every query
in
> SQL Server? For a Data Base, how do we set that and how do we verify the
> existing setting .
> --
> Ven